Bankruptcy
How to protect your tax refund from the Trustee
When someone who is facing financial difficulty decides to file for bankruptcy there are many secondary choices they must make. They may be able to decide which chapter of bankruptcy they should file, Chapter 7 liquidation or Chapter 13 reorganization. Once that decision has been made the Debtor then needs to decide, should they keep their home; should they keep their boat? Depending on their income and assets though the biggest choices typically revolves around their more liquid assets though. Which assets should they protect from the Trustee in a Chapter 7 bankruptcy case, and which ones should they expose.
In many situations there is no choice, due to the fact that a cap has been hit on an asset, such as a bank account, lost wages in a law suit or equity in a car. However, one such asset that is typically very difficult to exempt, unless a Debtor uses the Federal exemptions and has a wild card available is an anticipated or even realized tax refund. Under 11 U.S.C. § 542(a), any property that the Debtor held prior to filing his or her bankruptcy becomes property of the estate and is subject to turnover to the Trustee upon request.
In the past, if a Debtor has money owed to him from the Internal Revenue Service, such an asset must be listed on Schedule B of the bankruptcy petition and generally, the Trustee will look to take those funds as part of the liquidated bankruptcy estate, or demand that the unsecured Creditors be paid at least that amount in a Chapter 13 plan based upon the B22 analysis. This was true until very recently when an ingenious Debtor, James Winslow Graves and his bankruptcy attorney beat the system. You see, a Trustee is only entitled to demand an asset which the Debtor has a right to. This is no different then the legal theory “you can only give title to what you own”.
What this Debtor did was simply allow the IRS to take his tax refund and hold it in their possession until such time as he may need to pay taxes in the future. Now this may sound almost like a fraudulent transfer, but the IRS code is very clear on the matter. Under the tax code, once a tax payer elects to leave those funds on deposit with the United States and apply the overpayment to his or her future tax liability, that decision is irrevocable, or as my six year old child would say, “no take backs”! More specifically, the tax code states, “no claim for credit or refund of such overpayment shall be allowed for the taxable year in which the overpayment arises.” 26 U.S.C. § 6513(d).
The Trustee in this case argued the position that the refund amount was property of the estate under 11 U.S.C. § 541(a)(1), and that, since Debtors were receiving the benefit of the application of the refund, the funds should be treated as an account receivable of the Debtors, and Debtors should therefore be required to turn over an equivalent amount to the estate. However, both the Bankruptcy Court and the 10th Circuit Federal Court held that the tax code is clear and specific in its language and intent. The courts held the Debtor once he filed his taxes, had no rights to the tax refund and as a result could not “take it back”. If you find yourself in a similar position, The Florida case of In Re Graves, Docket Number. 08-1462 and In re Graves, 396 B.R. at 73 is the case to cite. The Creditors and the Trustee may think it unfair and even borderline deceptive, but the courts have spoken with its full opinon..
Debt settlement companies may mislead you
Recently, I have heard many Creditor rights and debt settlement companies making statements about bankruptcy that are at best inaccurate, and at worst an attempt to dissuade Debtors from filing bankruptcy in lieu of loosing their home and entering into long-term pay back plans with Creditors that are not in a Debtor’s best interest. For example, I read one blog article, What No One Tells You About Bankruptcy, Foreclosure and Your Credit, that suggests filing bankruptcy will not always stop a foreclosure, or that your credit score will be harmed beyond repair for a decade by filing a Chapter 13 case.With all due respect to these positions on bankruptcy and its effect on credit, I would suggest that most homeowners facing foreclosure are already at the bottom of the credit score spectrum. Additionally, the only way to guarantee that a foreclosure is stopped is by filing a bankruptcy. Pursuant to section 362(a) of Title 11, once a bankruptcy case is filed, the foreclosure MUST be stopped, and the only way a creditor can continue is by filing a motion for relief from the automatic stay. In order for a creditor to do this, the homeowner must fail to make there subsequent payments.
I will grant you that many Chapter 13 cases do fail, but the reason for that are unrealistic plans, and underestimating a Debtor’s expenses on schedule J, or an artificially inflated income on schedule I based upon untrue revenues from self employment.
What I have found in my practice is that a Debtor needs to take a hard look at there situation and determine if their house is (1) worth saving, and (2) if the homeowner has enough income to stay current and pay back their missed armaments over a 5 year period.
With respect to the contention that one’s credit score will decrease with the filing of a bankruptcy and be harmed for up to 10 years, that is a very dangerous statement to make. In fact, it is actually possible for your FICO score to increase after your bankruptcy discharge. The reason for this is very simple, approximately 35% of your credit score is based upon the amount of debt. If you discharge thousands of dollars in debt, then that part of the calculation can only increase. Another approximately 35% of the FICO score is based upon your payment history. If by filing a bankruptcy, you no longer have debts to be in arrears on, then again you can only go up, over time as you make your chapter 13 plan payments. This is not to say that filing of a bankruptcy does not take a negative toll on your credit score, but it is balanced by the positives. In many situations, Debtors, especially those with a mortgage can rebuild their credit with in 24 – 30 months to the point of obtaining new secured debt loans. I do however, caution my clients to be careful not to fall into their old bad habits which created the need for the bankruptcy filing.
The bottom lines is that if you are facing a foreclosure or have a significant amount of unsecured debt, it is always a good idea to talk to a bankruptcy attorney or consumer debt advocate in your area before making any decision. Most of these attorneys such as me do not charge a consultation fee for the initial meeting and can provide you with a great deal of insight.
This post was originally published on the blog of Goldstein and Clegg, LLC
Loan mods are not the only option
The term loan modification is not a new one, but it has picked up a lot of speed over the past year. In the past, homeowners and lenders have been able to workout deals to change the essential terms of a mortgage through private negations. However, in March of 2009, the United States government released their Home Affordable Modification Program (“HAMP”) and all of a sudden it was the new craze. The problem is now that the Government is involved at least to some extent, consumers seem to believe that banks have an obligation to “modify” or change a loan. When in reality, the government has no teeth to force the banks to do anything. A loan modification or credit workout is purely an optional program.
With that said, many consumers and frankly even Consumer Debt Advocates have been taken advantage of by the banks who have at the very least given the appearance of acting in a deceptive manor with respect to these loan modifications. Many homeowners were accepted into a loan modification trial program, in order to prove that they could make modified payments. The homeowners has made these payments for several months and after they have been faithfully making good on that agreement are kicked out for no reason, or even fraudulent or deceptive reasons and are facing foreclosure.
Many of use know the deal; the bank requests a bunch of documentation to review. They claim that they have not had a chance to review it and so ask for updated information. They do this while arrears are building up, and then finally offer a trial plan. Once the homeowner is in the trial plan for what is represented to them as 3 months, they soon learn that it can become two to three times as long, all the while the homeowner faithfully performs their obligations under a new agreement and pays sometimes tens of thousands of dollars to the bank, instead of investing that money in other avenues that my be more effective, such as filing for a chapter 13 bankruptcy, or challenging the standing of the banks.
It has been suggested by many on the interest though various blogs and chat rooms that this loan modification is nothing more then the banking industry’s “well-thought-out scam where the lender, knowing full well they ultimately intend to foreclose string the homeowner along to collect a few additional payments.
What many people do not seem to realize, is that there are other opportunities to save your home, or in the alternative, cut your losses before they arrears get too great to manage. The key to remember is that should you want to walk away from your home, if the home is sold for less then you owe, you may be liable for the debt. In order to avoid this, a simple Chapter 7 bankruptcy can eliminate that risk. Additionally, you can file a Chapter 13 case and pay back the missed payments over 5 years interest free. Perhaps more importantly, when you file a bankruptcy, the bank must stop any foreclosure or collection attempts for past due amounts. It may provide you with the time you need to go into court whether it be through the bankruptcy court, the land court or even superior court to challenge the standing of the bank.
The lender must prove that they even have a right to foreclose and in order to do this, they must have a copy of your original mortgage and note. If they can not produce that note, then a judge may indefinitely stay their foreclosure. If they file a claim for past due amounts, the bankruptcy court may hear this as evidence of a challenge to the proof of claim. You also may request a copy of your loan application and find out that there are many untrue statements that bank used to issue the loan. If this is the case, you may even be able to strengthen your position and negotiate a “real modification” where you have now come full circle.
Additionally, should you have a second mortgage that is not supported by any equity, you may be able to strip the lien entirely though a Chapter 13. In the event that the home is not your primary home, but rather an investment, you may even be able to cram down the principal to its current fair market value and a reasonable interest rate through a court order.
The bottom line is this, do not trust that you will obtain a loan modification even if you have been put into a trial period. You have several options, and should contact a qualified consumer debt attorney to learn what options are at your disposal.
How bankruptcy can affect children
The affects of bankruptcy can have a lasting impact on a person. Once a child is involved the affects can last for a long time. The topic of dealing with the affects of bankruptcy on children is not a topic that has received much attention over the years, but this topic is one that should be addressed.In many cases, parents try to minimize the affect of a bankruptcy on the family. Children in most situations may not even know anything has transpired. Moreover, it may be far less traumatic even if the children know their parents are facing financial distress, then to know your home has been taken away by the bank.
Once a bankruptcy claim is filed the courts will decide which debts require payment. As such, the court can determine that certain expenses are allowed while others are not. Once such expenses is 529 plans or other savings accounts for college. During times like this consulting with an attorney can be beneficial in order to get a good understanding of how your child may be affected once you file for bankruptcy. In addition, there are many other situations that can comingle a parents debt with the financial interest of their kids. To read more about these situations, check out Jonathan Ginsberg an Atlanta bankrutpcy attorney’s blog.
There is no doubt that the stress of bankruptcy can take a toll on a child. A study conducted by the Iowa State University Institute for Social and Behavioral Research states that children who experience socioeconomic adversity at an early age are at an increased risk of experiencing mental health challenges during their teen years. A child may begin to wonder whether or not their family will have a place to live or what will happen to them in the future. A family’s financial status can affect a child because of society’s emphasis on being financial stable and achieving a certain level of success. Once a child realizes the lack of financial resources available for their family that child may be embarrassed and could be subjected to negative treatment amongst his or her peers.
Despite all the negative emotions associated with bankruptcy it is important to keep your children involved in the financial matters of your family. If a parent is laid off from their job of made the decision to file for bankruptcy the financial make up of that family changes. The next step is to explain the financial situation of your family with your children so they are aware of the situation. Parents must remember that children are learning from how their parents are dealing with bankruptcy and other financial matters.
The issue of bankruptcy is not an issue topic to discuss. For parents the issue of bankruptcy can become even harder to explain because their financial outlook can be affected as well. Despite this obstacle, it is important to minimize as much stress as possible and make the right decisions that will benefit your children in the future.
Protecting debtors from failure to hire, promote or termination after filing bankruptcy
The stigma of filing bankruptcy has stopped many debtors who rightfully and propably necessarily need to file bankruptcy. The truth of the matter is that filing bankruptcy is a right granted to all Americans by Congress and as such, is a protected right. As a protected right, it is illegal to discriminate against debtors as employees pursuant to both Massachusetts law, MGL 151B, and Federal Law (Civil Rights Act and Bankruptcy Code). More specifically, 11 U.S.C.A § 525(b) provides, “No private employer may terminate the employment of, or discriminate with respect to employment against, an individual who is or has been a debtor under this title, a debtor or bankrupt under the Bankruptcy Act, or an individual associated with such debtor or bankrupt, solely because such debtor or bankrupt”.
There has been several cases directly on-point with the forgoing. In one case, a Police department rule rendering a city policeman subject to dismissal for the filing of a petition in bankruptcy was unconstitutional under U.S.C.A.Const. Art. 6, cl. 2, since the rule, while intended to insure a reliable and respectable police force, had the effect of prohibiting a policeman burdened with staggering debts from obtaining “a new opportunity in life and a clear field for future effort, unhampered by the pressure and discouragement of pre-existing debt”, an effect in direct contravention of the stated purpose of this title. Rutledge v. City of Shreveport, W.D.La.1975, 387 F.Supp. 1277.
Chapter 13 debtor, a former chief appraiser for a county tax appraisal district, was fired from her job in violation of the Bankruptcy Code’s antidiscrimination provision where it was apparent from the totality of the circumstances that appraisal district’s board of directors determined that debtor would be discharged because they were embarrassed that she had filed bankruptcy and that it had become public knowledge. In re McKibben, Bkrtcy.E.D.Tex.1999, 233 B.R. 378.
Pursuant to Federal and state law, it is also a violation of law to either refuse or fail to promote or hire an employee based upon their status as a bankruptcy filer. In one case, an employer’s failure to offer participation to debtor in commission advancement program after debtor had filed for bankruptcy, when all other account specialists were offered participation, violated antidiscrimination provision of Bankruptcy Code, where determining reason for failing to offer participation to debtor was fact of his bankruptcy. In re Vaughter, bkrtcy.W.D.Tex.1989, 109 B.R. 229.
How to Remove a Judgment Lien from your property
Many homeowners have found themselves in the position of owing money on a debt which they simply can not pay back, or have been sued by someone and failed to respond to the law suit. When this happens, the Plaintiff often will attempt to collect on their judgment by putting a lien on the homeowner’s property. Many of my bankruptcy client’s have come to me with just such a situation. This becomes an issue after a consumer’s unsecured debts have been discharged in bankruptcy. The reason is simple; the homeowner has a lien against their house post bankruptcy and they do not owe any money to the lien holder.
After a Chapter 7 discharge, a debtor may avoid a judicial lien by motion to the Court. To the extent lien impairs an exemption to which the debtor otherwise would have been entitled under the Bankruptcy laws. As a result, the bankruptcy court will grant a Chapter 7 debtor’s motion seeking to avoid a judicial lien if debtor’s equity in the property is less than the amount protected under the Massachusetts Homestead Act, which currently stands at $500,000 in value for the land and building, M.G.L. c. 188 § 1, and when the creditor’s lien fully impaired the debtor’s equity in the property. In re Lyons, 355 B.R. 287 (2006).
So what is the gist of all of this legal speak? When the collateral has no value, the creditor has no claim against it because it will be treated as unsecured, and thus the debtor may discharge that lien.
Foreclosure or Bankruptcy – Which Is the Lesser of Two Evils?
In the past, “bankruptcy” and “foreclosure” were dirty words. But in today’s economy, they’re realistic solutions to financial black holes brought on by job joss, medical catastrophe, or predatory mortgage lenders and credit card companies. If you’re a homeowner struggling with financial disasters, you probably know that you need to decide whether a foreclosure or a bankruptcy is the lesser of two financial evils.
If you choose bankruptcy, you may be able to eliminate credit card debt, medical bills, court-ordered judgments, and even debts for overdue utilities. With a discharge of these overwhelming debts, you can often keep up with the mortgage, thus saving the family home.
In contrast, choosing foreclosure means you’ll lose the house… but the house may not be worth saving if its value is less than the remaining mortgage. Homeowners who’ve worked with us have chosen to rent, or sometimes they own investment properties that they can move into, such as a multi-family house.
But neither bankruptcy nor foreclosure is an easy, one-size-fits-all, solution. For example, a bankruptcy stays on your credit report for 10 years, while a foreclosure is there for 8 years. Because a foreclosure drops off a credit report 2 years earlier than a bankruptcy, many homeowners believe it’s a “better” solution. But many reputable credit counselors report that a foreclosure has twice the negative impact on a credit score as a bankruptcy. It’s extremely difficult to get a new mortgage after losing a property to foreclosure. And some individuals who’ve gone through foreclosure report that they haven’t qualified for apartments they wanted, even though they’re able to afford the rent after the mortgage is gone.
On the other hand, we’ve seen that individuals who’ve gone through bankruptcies are better candidates for future financing, and often receive it earlier than individuals who’ve gone through foreclosures. The reason is simple: bankruptcy erases debt. After a bankruptcy, you don’t owe anything to anyone. Your income is yours again. And creditors also know that you can’t file for bankruptcy for another 8 years, so you can’t walk away from any new debt that you incur.
In some cases, a homeowner may be so far behind on the mortgage that a foreclosure is inevitable. There are two typical solutions. First, the homeowner could file for bankruptcy right before the foreclosure. If the mortgage lender sells the property for less than the mortgage owed, the difference between the foreclosure price and the mortgage (which the homeowner would ordinarily have repay to the lender) is discharged through the bankruptcy. Second, mortgage lenders know very well that homeowners can discharge this difference in bankruptcy instead of paying it back. So they’ll often wait to foreclose, which gives the homeowner an option to do a short sale (to be discussed in an upcoming blog).
In short, if you’re a homeowner struggling with debt, you have a lot of options. If you’re facing a financial crisis that may end in either foreclosure or bankruptcy, talk to an experienced attorney who can help you determine your best option. The right decision can save you years of financial trouble.
How to Remove a Judgment Lien from your property
Many homeowners have found themselves in the position of owing money on a debt which they simply can not pay back, or have been sued by someone and failed to respond to the law suit. When this happens, the Plaintiff often will attempt to collect on their judgment by putting a lien on the homeowner’s property. Many of my bankruptcy client’s have come to me with just such a situation. This becomes an issue after a consumer’s unsecured debts have been discharged in bankruptcy. The reason is simple; the homeowner has a lien against their house post bankruptcy and they do not owe any money to the lien holder.
After a Chapter 7 discharge, a debtor may avoid a judicial lien by motion to the Court. To the extent lien impairs an exemption to which the debtor otherwise would have been entitled under the Bankruptcy laws. As a result, the bankruptcy court will grant a Chapter 7 debtor’s motion seeking to avoid a judicial lien if debtor’s equity in the property is less than the amount protected under the Massachusetts Homestead Act, which currently stands at $500,000 in value for the land and building, M.G.L. c. 188 § 1, and when the creditor’s lien fully impaired the debtor’s equity in the property. In re Lyons, 355 B.R. 287 (2006).
So what is the gist of all of this legal speak? When the collateral has no value, the creditor has no claim against it because it will be treated as unsecured, and thus the debtor may discharge that lien.
Ripple Effects of Bankruptcy
In our current economy, there is a lot of talk about how your personal finances can permeate into your personal and professional lives. When you file bankruptcy, it is well known that your credit report will be severely impacted and that negative information will last for years. Although you might hit a roadblock in terms of borrowing in the immediate aftermath of your bankruptcy, your life will not wait.
One of the most fundamental needs a person can have is housing and after bankruptcy or foreclosure is housing. Many companies or landlords from whom you may wish to rent will conduct background checks that will include a criminal and financial check. If you’ve filed for bankruptcy, especially if it was relatively recent in the last 2 or 3 years, you might have difficulty getting someone to rent to you. One way around this is to rent with individual landlords who are more likely to have the latitude to account for your individual story once they meet with your personally. Apartments managed by a company are more likely to impose their set standards and not rent to you or be unwilling to consider your personal circumstances. Lastly, when looking for your first rental post-bankruptcy, air on the side of fiscal conservativeness and look for a very affordable unit to start. Once you build a strong post-bankruptcy rental history, it will likely over time open more options for you with future landlords.
Another area that can be affected by filing bankruptcy are services that many take for granted including insurance, cell phones, and home data information including cable, phone and internet. Many of these service providers require credit checks before they begin to offer services and if your history is unsatisfactory based on their standards, you may find yourself seeking other avenues to secure these services. If you find yourself in this position, you can expect two distinct possibilities, paying larger deposits if you are allowed to contract for these services or having to prepay for the services. Many companies will require you to pay for the services before you receive them via these larger deposits or limits on your service like prepaid cell phone plans.
Employment is a crucial aspect of anyone’s livelihood and is especially important to discuss in terms of seeking post bankruptcy employment. Potential employers will often conduct credit checks especially if the position entails handling money or other valuables. The best solution to this is to just be aware of the possibility and be certain when applying for jobs.
A final major area to expect to be drastically affected after bankruptcy is clearly the ability to be issued credit either as loans, mortgages or credit cards. Anyone who does extend credit to you will likely impose very high interest rates and severe terms. Be cautious when attempting to borrow by borrowing conservatively and being sure to account for the interest rates when you consider repayment. With credit cards, a new product has recently entered the market in the form of prepaid credit cards. Although these prepaid credit cards have “Mastercard” or “Visa” on them, they are not credit cards and are not subject to credit checks or reports to a credit bureau. Furthermore, since they are nothing more than a debit card, if they’re lost or stolen you are subject to actual cash losses and they are harder to dispute. The issuers of prepaid cards also generally impose more strict rules regarding lost or stolen cards including a requirement to report it within 48 hours or you’ll begin to bear the burden of the monetary loss.
In Massachusetts, if you find yourself facing discrimination from an existing relationship (service provider, employer etc.) after you’ve filed bankruptcy you may be able to be protected under M.G.L. Ch. 151B § 4 §§ 4A that prohibits such retaliation. Bankruptcy is a constitutionally protected act and it is illegal to retaliate against such a protected act. In any aspect of your life post-bankruptcy, the best tool you can have is knowledge so that you are not caught off guard and always have multiple options left available to you so that in the end all of your needs can be met to provide for yourself and your family.
The foregoing article was drafted by Justine Medina, for the Law Office of Goldstein and Clegg, LLC
