foreclosure defense
Debt settlement companies may mislead you
Recently, I have heard many Creditor rights and debt settlement companies making statements about bankruptcy that are at best inaccurate, and at worst an attempt to dissuade Debtors from filing bankruptcy in lieu of loosing their home and entering into long-term pay back plans with Creditors that are not in a Debtor’s best interest. For example, I read one blog article, What No One Tells You About Bankruptcy, Foreclosure and Your Credit, that suggests filing bankruptcy will not always stop a foreclosure, or that your credit score will be harmed beyond repair for a decade by filing a Chapter 13 case.With all due respect to these positions on bankruptcy and its effect on credit, I would suggest that most homeowners facing foreclosure are already at the bottom of the credit score spectrum. Additionally, the only way to guarantee that a foreclosure is stopped is by filing a bankruptcy. Pursuant to section 362(a) of Title 11, once a bankruptcy case is filed, the foreclosure MUST be stopped, and the only way a creditor can continue is by filing a motion for relief from the automatic stay. In order for a creditor to do this, the homeowner must fail to make there subsequent payments.
I will grant you that many Chapter 13 cases do fail, but the reason for that are unrealistic plans, and underestimating a Debtor’s expenses on schedule J, or an artificially inflated income on schedule I based upon untrue revenues from self employment.
What I have found in my practice is that a Debtor needs to take a hard look at there situation and determine if their house is (1) worth saving, and (2) if the homeowner has enough income to stay current and pay back their missed armaments over a 5 year period.
With respect to the contention that one’s credit score will decrease with the filing of a bankruptcy and be harmed for up to 10 years, that is a very dangerous statement to make. In fact, it is actually possible for your FICO score to increase after your bankruptcy discharge. The reason for this is very simple, approximately 35% of your credit score is based upon the amount of debt. If you discharge thousands of dollars in debt, then that part of the calculation can only increase. Another approximately 35% of the FICO score is based upon your payment history. If by filing a bankruptcy, you no longer have debts to be in arrears on, then again you can only go up, over time as you make your chapter 13 plan payments. This is not to say that filing of a bankruptcy does not take a negative toll on your credit score, but it is balanced by the positives. In many situations, Debtors, especially those with a mortgage can rebuild their credit with in 24 – 30 months to the point of obtaining new secured debt loans. I do however, caution my clients to be careful not to fall into their old bad habits which created the need for the bankruptcy filing.
The bottom lines is that if you are facing a foreclosure or have a significant amount of unsecured debt, it is always a good idea to talk to a bankruptcy attorney or consumer debt advocate in your area before making any decision. Most of these attorneys such as me do not charge a consultation fee for the initial meeting and can provide you with a great deal of insight.
This post was originally published on the blog of Goldstein and Clegg, LLC
How the HAMP loan modifications affect your credit score
For many consumers, their existing home mortgage obligation has outpaced their ability to pay it back. Many homeowners have suffered some form of a hardship, be it from the loss of a job, an illness, a divorce, or other similar type of situation. For those in such a situation, many have turned to President Obama’s loan modification program called the HAMP program. This is a great program because it allows a reduction in mortgage payments for 5 years. However, what many Consumers need to understand is how this program may or may not affect their credit score.
Many mortgage companies are reporting the modified mortgages to the credit bureaus as a “rolling 30-day late” while the modification are in its 90-day trial period. Homeowners are deemed “delinquent” during the trial period because the modified payment amount is less than the original mortgage payment amount, but the homeowner is not yet officially in the modification program.
THIS IS NOT HOW A LOAN MODIFICATION SHOULD BE REPORTED
Homeowners who are current on their mortgage when they enter into the trial modification period should not be reported as late, according to servicer guidelines for Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, as well as other loans (”non-GSE loans”) being modified by HAMP-participating servicers.
Homeowners who were delinquent when they entered the modification trial period, however, will continue to be reported as delinquent during the trial period. See below for more detail.
If your loan is owned or guaranteed by Fannie Mae, see page 12 of Fannie Mae Servicing Guide Announcement 09-05R for information about credit reporting for HAMP-modified Fannie Mae loans. It says:
“If a borrower is current when they enter the Trial Period, the servicer should report the borrower current but on a modified payment if the borrower makes timely payments by the last business day of each Trial Period month at the modified amount during the Trial Period. If a borrower is delinquent when they enter the Trial Period, the servicer should continue to report in such a manner that accurately reflects the borrower’s delinquency and workout status following usual and customary reporting standards. In both cases the servicer should report the modification when it becomes final.”
“Borrowers, who are current when they enter into the Trial Period and make payments by the 30th day of each month, report as current, but on a modified payment. Borrowers, who are delinquent when they enter into the Trial Period or do not make payments by the 30th of each month, report according to borrower’s delinquency and workout status. Notify when borrowers have completed the modification.”
If your loan is NOT owned or guaranteed by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, see page 22 of “HAMP Servicer Supplemental Directive 09-01? for information about credit reporting guidelines for modified non-GSE loans. It specifies the following:
“The servicer should continue to report a “full-file” status report to the four major credit repositories for each loan under the HAMP … on the basis of the following: (i) for borrowers who are current when they enter the trial period, the servicer should report the borrower current but on a modified payment if the borrower makes timely payments by the 30th day of each trial period month at the modified amount during the trial period, as well as report the modification when completed, and (ii) for borrowers who are delinquent when they enter the trial period, the servicer should continue to report in such a manner that accurately reflects the borrower’s delinquency and workout status following usual and customary reporting standards, as well as report the modification when completed. More detailed guidance on these reporting requirements will be published by the CDIA.”
Produce the Note (or mortgage)
I recently came across a great article drafted by a former paralegal of our firm, Rick D. Misitano regarding foreclosure defense. Below are the pertinent parts of that article. When a lender can’t produce the original note, allowing a foreclosure to proceed puts the homeowner at risk of owing that debt again to another party in the future.
So, what happens when the lender tells the Court it can’t produce the original note, because it is lost? Let’s start with the basics. If a lender wants to foreclose on a property, it has to be able to show that it is, in fact, the appropriate person to whom the money is owed. That right to foreclose belongs only to the person who has legitimate possession of the original note, not a copy, not an electronic entry, but the original note itself with the original signature of the person(s) who allegedly owes the money along with appropriate raised notary seal and signature. So, if you are faced with a foreclosure, you have every right to demand that the person or entity trying to take your property, first prove to the Court that they have the legal right do to so in the first place by proving they have legal possession of the original promissory note.
Pursuant to Federal and Massachusetts law, a Lender Must affirmativly prove:
1. The person or entity has to swear and attest that it no longer has the original note;
2. The person or entity has to prove that it was properly in possession of the note and was entitled to enforce it WHEN it lost possession of the note;
3. The person or entity has to prove it didn’t “lose” possession simply because it transferred the note to someone else (i.e., it’s not really lost); and
4. The person or entity has to prove that it cannot produce the original note because the instrument was destroyed or its whereabouts cannot be determined or it was stolen by someone who had no right to it.
All of these matters have to be definitively proven by the person or entity trying to foreclose on the property. It is not the obligation of the borrower to prove or disprove any of this. The borrower can challenge the right of the person or entity trying to foreclose and demand proof.
