loan modification
How will a loan modification affect your credit score?
As homeowners continue to default on their mortgage obligations, and try to reorganize their finances the need to work their lenders has become increasingly important. As I have discussed in the past in this blog, loan modifications are not a new fad, or President Obama’s great new invention, but rather a tried and true tactic known as negotiation. With this said, many homeowners are concerned though as to what will the impact be on their credit score should they opt for a HAMP or traditional loan modification or credit workout.
According to an article by Moe Bedard, on September 29, 2010, “a recent VantageScore Solutions survey using more than 400,000 active, anonymous consumer credit files shows that loan modification options have very little effect on [credit] scores.”
In order to forecast a consumer’s projected credit score, it has been suggested that a crystal ball and tarot cards may be in order. This suggestion though is a bit far fetched, even for the ever difficult, but not completely unpredictable FICO score rating. With respect to the contention that one’s credit score will decrease with a loan modification, which is a very dangerous statement to make. Not only is it likely that credit scores may not be impacted in a significant way by loan modification, but they may save a homeowner’s house. The reason credit scores are not affected much may in fact be rather simple. Approximately 35% of your credit score is based upon the amount of debt. If you enter into a loan modification, the amount of debt is not generally altered in any way and in some cases, under the HAMP program, very small amounts of principal may even be set aside, up to $83 per month. Another approximately 35% of the FICO score is based upon your payment history. If a homeowner was behind on making payments and enters into a loan modification, and their new payment history is reported, then a credit score can only improve. Now, it is true that some mortgage servicers do not report during a loan modification or even report a late payment if the payment is not set up properly, however, for the most part, homeowners’ credit should not be affected in a manor that should come into play when considering a loan modification.
I want to add a note of caution though to anyone trying to workout a deal with their bank. As we have seen all too often, many investors are offering temporary or even full blown modifications only to withdraw their offer down the road. With that said, in many situations, a bankruptcy, may be a better option to allow a consumer to catch up on their arrears. As with any complex legal situation, it is advisable to consult with a bankruptcy lawyer in your area.
Loan mods are not the only option
The term loan modification is not a new one, but it has picked up a lot of speed over the past year. In the past, homeowners and lenders have been able to workout deals to change the essential terms of a mortgage through private negations. However, in March of 2009, the United States government released their Home Affordable Modification Program (“HAMP”) and all of a sudden it was the new craze. The problem is now that the Government is involved at least to some extent, consumers seem to believe that banks have an obligation to “modify” or change a loan. When in reality, the government has no teeth to force the banks to do anything. A loan modification or credit workout is purely an optional program.
With that said, many consumers and frankly even Consumer Debt Advocates have been taken advantage of by the banks who have at the very least given the appearance of acting in a deceptive manor with respect to these loan modifications. Many homeowners were accepted into a loan modification trial program, in order to prove that they could make modified payments. The homeowners has made these payments for several months and after they have been faithfully making good on that agreement are kicked out for no reason, or even fraudulent or deceptive reasons and are facing foreclosure.
Many of use know the deal; the bank requests a bunch of documentation to review. They claim that they have not had a chance to review it and so ask for updated information. They do this while arrears are building up, and then finally offer a trial plan. Once the homeowner is in the trial plan for what is represented to them as 3 months, they soon learn that it can become two to three times as long, all the while the homeowner faithfully performs their obligations under a new agreement and pays sometimes tens of thousands of dollars to the bank, instead of investing that money in other avenues that my be more effective, such as filing for a chapter 13 bankruptcy, or challenging the standing of the banks.
It has been suggested by many on the interest though various blogs and chat rooms that this loan modification is nothing more then the banking industry’s “well-thought-out scam where the lender, knowing full well they ultimately intend to foreclose string the homeowner along to collect a few additional payments.
What many people do not seem to realize, is that there are other opportunities to save your home, or in the alternative, cut your losses before they arrears get too great to manage. The key to remember is that should you want to walk away from your home, if the home is sold for less then you owe, you may be liable for the debt. In order to avoid this, a simple Chapter 7 bankruptcy can eliminate that risk. Additionally, you can file a Chapter 13 case and pay back the missed payments over 5 years interest free. Perhaps more importantly, when you file a bankruptcy, the bank must stop any foreclosure or collection attempts for past due amounts. It may provide you with the time you need to go into court whether it be through the bankruptcy court, the land court or even superior court to challenge the standing of the bank.
The lender must prove that they even have a right to foreclose and in order to do this, they must have a copy of your original mortgage and note. If they can not produce that note, then a judge may indefinitely stay their foreclosure. If they file a claim for past due amounts, the bankruptcy court may hear this as evidence of a challenge to the proof of claim. You also may request a copy of your loan application and find out that there are many untrue statements that bank used to issue the loan. If this is the case, you may even be able to strengthen your position and negotiate a “real modification” where you have now come full circle.
Additionally, should you have a second mortgage that is not supported by any equity, you may be able to strip the lien entirely though a Chapter 13. In the event that the home is not your primary home, but rather an investment, you may even be able to cram down the principal to its current fair market value and a reasonable interest rate through a court order.
The bottom line is this, do not trust that you will obtain a loan modification even if you have been put into a trial period. You have several options, and should contact a qualified consumer debt attorney to learn what options are at your disposal.
How to Find the Owner of Your Mortgage
Concerns continue about parties filing foreclosures when they do not own the note. Florida recently enacted a rules requiring plaintiffs in foreclosure to verify ownership of the note. (Here’s a brief article on the rules, with the original subheading “Bankers Don’t Like It”). While these concerns may be interesting for those of us who understand civil procedure, standing, and the importance of the rule of law, the practical problem looms for homeowners who want to know who owns their note. Particularly, in non-judicial foreclosure states or for those families who are not in foreclosure, they do not have the option to ask the judge to order the plaintiff (foreclosing lender) to prove ownership.
John Rao, an attorney at the National Consumer Law Center and Credit Slips guest blogger, wrote a great short piece in the National Association of Bankruptcy Trustees publication this winter called “Six Ways to Find Out Who Owns and Services the Mortgage.” I can’t seem to find an online version, so I’ll give the short story here. For ownership (rather than servicing), the best options that John identifies are:
1) Send a request to the servicer asking it to tell you (the borrower) who the actual holder of the mortgage is, and to provide the address and telephone number of the owner of the obligation. These requests are authorized by Truth in Lending section 1641(f)(2). Importantly, the Helping Families Save Their Homes act of 2009 amended the Truth in Lending Act to provide a remedy for non-compliance. Borrowers can recover actual damages, statutory damages, costs and fees.
2) Review the transfer of ownership notices that are required to be sent as of May 20, 2009 and thereafter under the Helping Families Save Their Homes Act. This one won’t help for loans bought and sold long ago, but at least Congress heard the message that tracking down ownership is a problem.
3) Send a “qualified written request” under the Real Estate Servicing Procedures Act (RESPA). While this statute primarily is aimed at servicers, John Rao points out that because the servicer acts as an agent for the owner of the mortgage, the request is related to the servicing. The servicer has 60 business days to comply, which may be too long for families facing foreclosure. Actual damages, costs and attorneys fees are available for violation. HUD provides a little information on how to make a qualified written request on its website.
It’s important to note what is NOT on this list: the old-fashioned method of searching the land records. John includes that method in his list of six ways, but cautions not to rely solely on the registry of deeds because many assignments are not recorded. I think in a world of MERS, and missing paper, the land record system needs a hard look. The point of that system is to provide a public record of security interests in land, but it’s clearly no longer serving that function in the way it historically has. In what ways is the land record system failing? How should we fix it? Do we need penalties for not recording assignments? Or federal regulation of MERS? Or something else entirely?
Freddie Mac comments on the SAFE Act
There has been much talk recently about the SAFE Act and if it applys to those negotiating loans. The key to remember is that the act is really intended to apply to loan originators, not those dealing with short term loan modifications. To that end, Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae drafted a response to HUD, an excerpt of this can be found below.
The language of the SAFE Act is consistent with the conclusion that it does not apply to servicers or loss mitigation specialists. The Act requires registration of “loan originators”, defined as individuals who —
(i) take residential mortgage loan applications; and
(ii) offer or negotiate terms of residential mortgage loans for compensation or gain. 12U.S.C. 5102(3)(A).
Loss mitigation specialists do not meet the statutory definition because they do not accept residential mortgage loan applications.
The legislative history confirms that the SAFE Act’s licensing and registration requirements were designed to apply only to “loan originators.” When Senator Feinstein introduced the S.A.F.E. Licensing Act of 2008 (S.2595), which was later incorporated into the Housing and Economic Recovery Act, she stated that the legislation “would create a comprehensive database of all residential mortgage loan originators. This includes mortgage brokers and lenders, as well as loan officers of national banks and their subsidiaries.” Congressional Record-Senate, 734 (February 6, 2008). Similarly, in a floor statement in July 2008, Senator Dodd made clear that the provisions of the bill were intended to cover only “loan originators.” Congressional Record-Senate, S6520 (July 10, 2008). The legislative history does not support an interpretation that covers loss mitigation specialists.
Why Your Tax Forms Are So Important to Your Attorney
When you work with an attorney on a bankruptcy filing, there’s a long list of documents you’ll be asked to gather and give to your attorney. Some of the most critical documents you’ll gather are your last three years’ worth of tax filings, both state and federal. Why are these so important?
First, and most important, tax returns contain a great deal of the financial information that your attorney will use when preparing your bankruptcy petition. Your attorney will review your returns to get a good foundational grasp of your financial situation—what real estate you own and whether it’s investment property; what bank accounts or investments you may hold; whether you are self-employed and how the business has been doing over time, and so on.
Similarly, your attorney uses your tax returns as a kind of financial checklist when preparing your bankruptcy petition. Most of the information that you’ve already reported on your tax returns is information that your attorney must include in your petition.
Importantly, bankruptcy is information-based. In other areas of law, when you go to court, you may be asked to testify and tell your side of the story. At your bankruptcy hearing, your bankruptcy petition—the specialized financial report that your attorney has presented to the court for approval—tells your story for you. The bankruptcy trustee who examines your petition may ask some questions, but the more accurate and detailed your attorney’s information, the easier it is for the bankruptcy trustee to review and approve your petition.
So don’t flinch when your attorney asks for copies of your tax returns. You can share them confidently, knowing that your attorney is helping you toward bankruptcy’s “fresh financial start.”
The forgoing post was drafted by Marsha Graham and Liz Weishaar who have both been heard on the Consumer Debt Radio Show and work in an of counsel relationship to The Law Office of Goldstein and Clegg, LLC as well as for the Law Office of Weishaar and Graham.
Home Affordability Modification Program: The Troubling Reality
|
President Obama’s Home Affordability Modification Program (HAMP) was intended with the purpose of keeping homeowners in their houses. Unfortunately, the idea was wonderful and the basic core concepts of the HAMP appear to be generated with good faith in mind but it lacks one key component—success in purpose. In other words, HAMP is failing and the troubling reality of the program is becoming very clear.
|
Image Credit: blog.Foreclosure.com |
|
The HAMP was designed to get consumers to work directly with their mortgage company to get into a modification of their current mortgage payment. The program was intended to make the modification so the consumer could actually make a payment that they could afford. The amount of the payment is based upon the general economic principle that a mortgage payment should be about a third of the homeowner’s income. The problem with this philosophy is that the principle owed to the mortgage company is too large to minimize to a third of the homeowner’s income or the homeowner’s income and other expenses cannot meet even the third payment. However, there are more problems on the surface of the HAMP. Once a homeowner is initially accepted into the trial period, the homeowner is given the false hope that this is a final agreement. The “trial” period is exactly that—“a trial.” It is not a final agreement. A homeowner can make all the required payments asked of them in this trial period and still not receive a final agreement from the mortgage company. The real issue is that a mortgage company is only required to “consider” the homeowner for the program. (See Home Affordability Modification Act 2009). A mortgage company is not required to do anything at all for the homeowner under the HAMP. The troubling reality of the program is that a homeowner could make three months of payments and still not have a final agreement and still be facing a foreclosure sale. Unfortunately, the most common pattern that we are seeing with this program is that homeowners are making three months of the trial payments and then being denied without cause or for some superficial reason. If this should happen to you, you should immediately seek a bankruptcy attorney to ensure protection of your home from a foreclosure sale. So what was once thought to be the hope of a nation is really a troubling facade. If you have experienced the troubling reality of the HAMP, we want to hear from you. Please email us at http://www.consumerdebtradio.com/contact.asp. |
|
Home Affordability Modification Program: How does it work?
Everyone knows about President Obama’s program known as the Home Affordability Modification Program (“HAMP”). Many have wondered if the program can help them save their home, but how does it work? In brief, the HAMP was designed to save your home if you are struggling to pay your mortgage. It was also designed for consumers to be able to work through the process on their own without the need of an attorney or a consultant.
The HAMP process is not really that difficult. A consumer should review the mortgage company’s web site for all required documentation which is needed in order to be considered for the HAMP. Once all the required documents are submitted the company will put the consumer’s request for review under the HAMP into a pool of thousands of other like consumers.
It sounds simple right? Well, there are many problems hidden within this simply process. A consumer should keep in mind that the mortgage company in the HAMP is trying everything not to get the consumer into the review of the program. What I mean by this is that the mortgage company is likely to reject a consumer’s request for not having all documents requested even though you’ve submitted them. Also, the mortgage company is not going to stop foreclosure proceeding while the consumer’s request sits in the pool of thousands of request. The biggest issue with this process is time. The HAMP process is likely to take 3 to 12 months.
How to ensure that this process works for you? You really will need to either make a commitment to setting aside at least two hours a week to follow up with the mortgage company for updates and to ensure that the mortgage company continues to review your request. Alternatively, you could hire a professional like an attorney to ensure that the mortgage company continues to review your request and to ensure that the process is documented.
Overall HAMP is a simple process, but be prepared to dedicate the required time to prepare the documents and also for the long review process.
Home Affordable Mortgage Program Calculation
Many Consumer’s have heard of the Home Affordable Modification Program (“HAMP”). This is the Federal loan modification program. However, what most consumers do not realize is that the calculation of a new mortgage payment is very guideline specific. The following is a detailed explanation of how the program calculates the new or modified payment under HAMP.
The goal for borrowers, as they seek a HAMP Modification, is a Front-End Debt-to-Income of 31%. In plain English this ratio measures the percentage of monthly gross income that is consumed by debt and housing payments. This rate considers the value of consumer expenses compared to the borrower’s gross monthly income. This calculation begins with the reduction of mortgage payments by the investor to no more than 38%. The subsequent reductions by the lender, to get to the target of 31%, rest on the reduction of the borrower’s interest. If, however, the reduction reaches the floor of 2% without reaching 31%, the borrower may need to account for the difference with annual increases of the interest rate.
Once the lender reduces mortgage payments to no more than 38% Front-End Debt-to-Income ratio, the Federal Government will match further reductions in monthly payments down to 31% Front-End Debt-to-Income ratio for the borrower. At this point, lenders may capitalize arrearage.
The target Front-End Debt-to-Income (DTI) is 31%. The Standard Waterfall step that results in a Front-End DTI closest to 31% without going below 31% will satisfy the Front-End DTI Target. Front-End DTI is the ratio of PITIA to Monthly Gross Income.
- Gross Monthly Income—the amount before any payroll deductions.
- The total first mortgage debt and monthly payments (PITIA). This includes principal, interest, taxes, insurance, and homeowners association and/or condominium fees.
The calculation to reduce the interest rate to reach the Front-End DTI Target is subject to a floor of 2%. The interest rate reduction shall be made in increments of 0.125%, with the goal of bringing the monthly payment as close as possible to the Front-End DTI, without going below 31%.
If the modified interest rate is at or above the highest interest rate allowed by the original mortgage note, the modified interest rate will be the new note rate for the remaining loan term. If, however, the modified interest rate is below the maximum allowed rate in the note, the modified interest rate will be in effect for the first five years, followed by annual increases, until the interest rate reaches the interest rate cap, of up to 1% per year. The interest rate will be fixed once the interest rate reaches the interest rate cap. If the Front-End Debt to Income target has not been reached, the term of the loan shall be extended up to 40 years
It should be noted that there is no requirement to use principal reduction under HAMP, but servicers may forgive principal to achieve the Front-End Debt-to-Income target. Consumers should recall that the goal is to reduce Front-End DTI to 31%. By forgiving principal, monthly payments (as part of the PITIA calculation) are drastically reduced, thus reducing to overall ratio.
How the HAMP loan modifications affect your credit score
For many consumers, their existing home mortgage obligation has outpaced their ability to pay it back. Many homeowners have suffered some form of a hardship, be it from the loss of a job, an illness, a divorce, or other similar type of situation. For those in such a situation, many have turned to President Obama’s loan modification program called the HAMP program. This is a great program because it allows a reduction in mortgage payments for 5 years. However, what many Consumers need to understand is how this program may or may not affect their credit score.
Many mortgage companies are reporting the modified mortgages to the credit bureaus as a “rolling 30-day late” while the modification are in its 90-day trial period. Homeowners are deemed “delinquent” during the trial period because the modified payment amount is less than the original mortgage payment amount, but the homeowner is not yet officially in the modification program.
THIS IS NOT HOW A LOAN MODIFICATION SHOULD BE REPORTED
Homeowners who are current on their mortgage when they enter into the trial modification period should not be reported as late, according to servicer guidelines for Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, as well as other loans (”non-GSE loans”) being modified by HAMP-participating servicers.
Homeowners who were delinquent when they entered the modification trial period, however, will continue to be reported as delinquent during the trial period. See below for more detail.
If your loan is owned or guaranteed by Fannie Mae, see page 12 of Fannie Mae Servicing Guide Announcement 09-05R for information about credit reporting for HAMP-modified Fannie Mae loans. It says:
“If a borrower is current when they enter the Trial Period, the servicer should report the borrower current but on a modified payment if the borrower makes timely payments by the last business day of each Trial Period month at the modified amount during the Trial Period. If a borrower is delinquent when they enter the Trial Period, the servicer should continue to report in such a manner that accurately reflects the borrower’s delinquency and workout status following usual and customary reporting standards. In both cases the servicer should report the modification when it becomes final.”
“Borrowers, who are current when they enter into the Trial Period and make payments by the 30th day of each month, report as current, but on a modified payment. Borrowers, who are delinquent when they enter into the Trial Period or do not make payments by the 30th of each month, report according to borrower’s delinquency and workout status. Notify when borrowers have completed the modification.”
If your loan is NOT owned or guaranteed by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, see page 22 of “HAMP Servicer Supplemental Directive 09-01? for information about credit reporting guidelines for modified non-GSE loans. It specifies the following:
“The servicer should continue to report a “full-file” status report to the four major credit repositories for each loan under the HAMP … on the basis of the following: (i) for borrowers who are current when they enter the trial period, the servicer should report the borrower current but on a modified payment if the borrower makes timely payments by the 30th day of each trial period month at the modified amount during the trial period, as well as report the modification when completed, and (ii) for borrowers who are delinquent when they enter the trial period, the servicer should continue to report in such a manner that accurately reflects the borrower’s delinquency and workout status following usual and customary reporting standards, as well as report the modification when completed. More detailed guidance on these reporting requirements will be published by the CDIA.”
Deed for Lease Program
Even if you don’t qualify for a loan modification through the HAMP or some other loan workout program, you may be able to qualify for the Deed for Lease Program by Fannie Mae (“D4L”). This is a new option for qualified borrowers or tenants of borrowers, who have Fannie Mae loans, who are facing foreclosure. According to Fannie Mae, the program will allow the homeowner or tenant to remain in their home by surrendering the deed to their home to Fannie Mae and in return be allowed to sign a lease through a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure transaction. Fannie Mae executives were quoted in an MSNBC report stating, “the rental program is designed to help delinquent homeowners who don’t qualify for a loan modification, but still want to stay in their homes”
The program is intended to keep families in their homes even after a possible foreclosure or transfer of ownership of their property back to the bank by executing a lease of up to 12 months. Investment properties that are tenant-occupied may also be considered as long as the borrower is cooperative in providing information from the tenant to facilitate the transfer of ownership.
A CNN report quoted Jay Ryan, a Fannie Mae vice president, “The program helps eliminate some of the uncertainty of foreclosure, keeps families and tenants in their homes during a transitional period, and helps to stabilize neighborhoods and communities”.
As stated in the November 5, 2009 announcement by Fannie Mae, In order to qualify for the Deed for Lease Program, the occupant of the property must have the ability to pay rent at the value the market bears, which can not be more then 31% of his or her monthly gross income. The home must also be the primary residence of either the homeowner or the tenant who will continue to occupy the property. The homeowner must not be more then 12 months behind on their mortgage payments and most importantly, the person responsible for paying the rent, will have verifiable income. In addition, Fannie Mae will inspect the property to confirm that the occupants have been keeping the property in good condition. The occupants will need to agree to be responsible for regular maintenance, to keep the property in good condition, and to permit marketing of the property for sale. Finally, the occupants signing the lease must agree to a credit review and all occupants over the age of 18 must have an acceptable background check.
At the conclusion of the 12 month lease term, there is the potential for a month-to-month extensions of the lease. There is also the potential to buy back the property from Fannie Mae at the end of the lease period if the homeowner can obtain the proper funding. The obvious benefit here is that the buy back price would be at current market value and not at the original mortgage value. If the value of the home has decreased too much, it is also possible the Lender will want to continue to rent the property to the occupant in order to continue to generate cash flow.
To find out if your loan is with Fannie Mae go to:
http://loanlookup.fanniemae.com/loanlookup/
